Fabrice!
Hows it going?!
I did get the module you linked but there is no difference in the behaviour. I ran a diff on the link you sent me and the stock module and got no differences.
Am I missing something?
Jake Sallee
Godfather of Bandwidth
System Engineer
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
WWW.UMHB.EDU
900 College St.
Belton, Texas
76513
Fone: 254-295-4658
Phax: 254-295-4221
________________________________________
From: Durand fabrice [***@inverse.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 6:04 PM
To: packetfence-***@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-devel] Testing Aruba 205H in PF 5.3.1
Hi Jakes,
you must have the devel version, let's use this version instead:
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/packetfence-5.3.1/lib/pf/Switch/ArubaSwitch.pm
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2015-09-30 18:50, Sallee, Jake a écrit :
> Louis:
>
> I updated the ArubeSwitch.pm module and re-ran the test after I switched the AP to the Aruba Switch type in the config.
>
> I now have a new error ... so thats progress ... right?
>
> Sep 30 17:48:15 httpd.webservices(23257) WARN: [10.11.40.252] Unable to perform RADIUS CoA-Request: Can't locate object method "deauth_source_ip" via package "pf::Switch::ArubaSwitch" at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/Switch/ArubaSwitch.pm line 238. (pf::Switch::ArubaSwitch::__ANON__)
>
>
> Jake Sallee
> Godfather of Bandwidth
> System Engineer
> University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
> WWW.UMHB.EDU
>
> 900 College St.
> Belton, Texas
> 76513
>
> Fone: 254-295-4658
> Phax: 254-295-4221
> ________________________________
> From: Durand fabrice [***@inverse.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 5:07 PM
> To: packetfence-***@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-devel] Testing Aruba 205H in PF 5.3.1
>
> Hi Jakes,
>
> can you try with Aruba Switches module ?
> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/lib/pf/Switch/ArubaSwitch.pm
>
> Regards
> Fabrice
>
>
>
> Le 2015-09-30 17:38, Sallee, Jake a écrit :
>
> Louis:
>
> I did as you suggested and got the latest version of the aruba module, but no luck : (
>
> Here is the config:
> [10.11.40.252] ## This is the IP of the virtual controller##
> type=Aruba
> radiusSecret=[REDACTED]
> guestVlan=112
> defaultRole=default
> defaultVlan=111
> deauthMethod=RADIUS
> AccessListMap=N
> gamingRole=gaming
> type=Aruba::Controller_200
> guestRole=guest
> gamingVlan=112
>
> Here is the error:
>
> Sep 30 16:24:29 httpd.webservices(2389) WARN: Until CoA is implemented we will bounce the port on VLAN re-assignment traps for MAC-Auth (pf::Switch::handleReAssignVlanTrapForWiredMacAuth)
>
> I checked on the method referenced in the error and the comments made it sound like RADIUS CoA is not supported for wired Mac-Auth on any switch ...
>
> =================================
> =item handleReAssignVlanTrapForWiredMacAuth
> Called when a ReAssignVlan trap is received for a switch-port in Wired MAC Authentication.
> Default behavior is to bounce the port
> =cut
>
> sub handleReAssignVlanTrapForWiredMacAuth {
> my ($this, $ifIndex, $mac) = @_;
> my $logger = Log::Log4perl::get_logger(ref($this));
>
> # TODO extract that behavior in a method call in pf::vlan so it can be overridden easily
>
> $logger->warn("Until CoA is implemented we will bounce the port on VLAN re-assignment traps for MAC-Auth");
>
> # TODO perform CoA instead (when implemented)
> # actually once CoA will be implemented, we should consider offering the same option to users
> # as we currently do with port-security and VoIP which is bounce or not bounce and suffer consequences
> # this should be a choice exposed in configuration and not hidden in code
> $this->bouncePort($ifIndex);
> }
> =================================
>
> Am I barking up the wrong tree here? Should I be looking into the radius module?
>
>
> Jake Sallee
>
> Godfather of Bandwidth
>
> System Engineer
>
> University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
>
> WWW.UMHB.EDU<http://WWW.UMHB.EDU>
>
>
>
> 900 College St.
>
> Belton, Texas
>
> 76513
>
>
>
> Fone: 254-295-4658
>
> Phax: 254-295-4221
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Louis Munro [***@inverse.ca<mailto:***@inverse.ca>]
>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 3:11 PM
>
> To: packetfence-***@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:packetfence-***@lists.sourceforge.net>
>
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-devel] Testing Aruba 205H in PF 5.3.1
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Jake,
>
>
>
> Could you post both your config for the Aruba in conf/switches.conf and the error in the logs?
>
>
>
> You may want to avail yourself of the latest version of the Aruba module at :
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/devel/lib/pf/Switch/Aruba.pm
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Louis Munro
>
> ***@inverse.ca<mailto:***@inverse.ca> :: www.inverse.ca<http://www.inverse.ca>
>
> +1.514.447.4918 x125 :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125
>
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu<http://www.sogo.nu>) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org<http://www.packetfence.org>)
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2015, at 16:07 , Sallee, Jake <***@umhb.edu><mailto:***@umhb.edu>
> wrote:
>
> I
> need to test the Aruba 205H to see if it will work with PF 5.3.1, but the RADIUS module is throwing the switch unsupported error.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-devel mailing list
> PacketFence-***@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:PacketFence-***@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-devel mailing list
> PacketFence-***@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel