[PacketFence-devel] IPv6 Support?

[Lee, Raymond]

Hello,

I'm stirring the IPv6 pot again. I haven't seen any definitive responses to the other IPv6 queries out there, so I thought I'd ask again. Sorry for the repeat question.

Is there full IPv6 support in the latest version of PacketFence (5.7.0)? If not, is there a roadmap on when it might be supported? IPv6 is a hard requirement in my network, and we're looking for a NAC (preferably OpenSource) that can support it.

Ref.
http://packetfence.org/bugs/view.php?id=1145
https://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/31899916/
https://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/30876987/


Thanks,
Ray


This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.

[Tim DeNike]

They are just beginning to support IPv6. Nothing substantial at this point.

Post by Lee, Raymond
Hello,
I’m stirring the IPv6 pot again. I haven’t seen any definitive responses
to the other IPv6 queries out there, so I thought I’d ask again. Sorry for
the repeat question.
Is there full IPv6 support in the latest version of PacketFence (5.7.0)?
If not, is there a roadmap on when it might be supported? IPv6 is a hard
requirement in my network, and we’re looking for a NAC (preferably
OpenSource) that can support it.
Ref.
http://packetfence.org/bugs/view.php?id=1145
https://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/31899916/
https://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/30876987/
Thanks,
Ray
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain
confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this
communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender
by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any
attachments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-devel mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel

[Lee, Raymond]

Thanks, Tim. Do you know which functionalities currently support IPv6 and which are still lacking?


Thanks,
Ray

From: Tim DeNike [mailto:***@mcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 12:58 PM
To: packetfence-***@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-devel] IPv6 Support?

They are just beginning to support IPv6. Nothing substantial at this point.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Lee, Raymond <***@centurylink.com<mailto:***@centurylink.com>> wrote:
Hello,

I’m stirring the IPv6 pot again. I haven’t seen any definitive responses to the other IPv6 queries out there, so I thought I’d ask again. Sorry for the repeat question.

Is there full IPv6 support in the latest version of PacketFence (5.7.0)? If not, is there a roadmap on when it might be supported? IPv6 is a hard requirement in my network, and we’re looking for a NAC (preferably OpenSource) that can support it.

Ref.
http://packetfence.org/bugs/view.php?id=1145
https://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/31899916/
https://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/30876987/


Thanks,
Ray

This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-devel mailing list
PacketFence-***@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:PacketFence-***@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel

This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.

[Tim DeNike]

Right now all they do is harvest dhcpv6 fingerprints. There is no other
functionality. I'm personally waiting for firewall sso updates with the
devices v6 address, neighbor discovery snooping, and external portal
support. Secondary needs for me are v6 radius client/server support.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 4, 2016, at 1:05 PM, Lee, Raymond <***@centurylink.com>
wrote:

Thanks, Tim. Do you know which functionalities currently support IPv6 and
which are still lacking?




Thanks,
Ray

*From:* Tim DeNike [mailto:***@mcc.edu <***@mcc.edu>]
*Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 12:58 PM
*To:* packetfence-***@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-devel] IPv6 Support?



They are just beginning to support IPv6. Nothing substantial at this point.



On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Lee, Raymond <***@centurylink.com>
wrote:

Hello,



I’m stirring the IPv6 pot again. I haven’t seen any definitive responses
to the other IPv6 queries out there, so I thought I’d ask again. Sorry for
the repeat question.



Is there full IPv6 support in the latest version of PacketFence (5.7.0)?
If not, is there a roadmap on when it might be supported? IPv6 is a hard
requirement in my network, and we’re looking for a NAC (preferably
OpenSource) that can support it.



Ref.

http://packetfence.org/bugs/view.php?id=1145

https://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/31899916/

https://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/30876987/




Thanks,
Ray



This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain
confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this
communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender
by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any
attachments.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-devel mailing list
PacketFence-***@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel


This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain
confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this
communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender
by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any
attachments.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Louis Munro]

Thank you Tim,
While I can’t promise to deliver anything specific, It’s interesting to us to know just what exactly people would like PacketFence to do.

Keep em coming.
We’re adding that stuff to the big old TODO list.

Regards,
--
Louis Munro
***@inverse.ca :: www.inverse.ca
+1.514.447.4918 x125 :: [phone] x125
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)

Right now all they do is harvest dhcpv6 fingerprints. There is no other functionality. I'm personally waiting for firewall sso updates with the devices v6 address, neighbor discovery snooping, and external portal support. Secondary needs for me are v6 radius client/server support.

[Tim DeNike]

Tracking dhcpv6 prefix delegations as well as the IA address are equally
important. We run primarily dhcpv6 but on wireless that isn't an option
because android is broken. Aruba can sniff the stateless addresses but
won't relay it in radius unless we use v6 radius servers.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 4, 2016, at 5:33 PM, Louis Munro <***@inverse.ca> wrote:

Thank you Tim,
While I can’t promise to deliver anything specific, It’s interesting to us
to know just what exactly people would like PacketFence to do.

Keep em coming.
We’re adding that stuff to the big old TODO list.

Regards,
--
Louis Munro
***@inverse.ca :: www.inverse.ca
+1.514.447.4918 x125 :: [phone] x125
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (
www.packetfence.org)

On Apr 4, 2016, at 17:22 , Tim DeNike <***@mcc.edu> wrote:

Right now all they do is harvest dhcpv6 fingerprints. There is no other
functionality. I'm personally waiting for firewall sso updates with the
devices v6 address, neighbor discovery snooping, and external portal
support. Secondary needs for me are v6 radius client/server support.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------